Those were organizational website references, not page references. The two organizations I cited were the ones that put together the info graphic in the article that you are attacking.

Here it is again for your perusal. Check out the “Source” citation at the bottom.

The Wikipedia page you cite is the same one that I cited to you to back up MY claim. Which it does. That Wiki page does NOT show what you are claiming.

I think you just skimmed down to the following:

“Polling place electronic voting or Internet voting examples have taken place in Australia,[1] Belgium,[2][3] Brazil,[4] Estonia,[5][6] France, Germany, India,.[7] Italy, Namibia, the Netherlands (Rijnland Internet Election System), Norway, Peru, Switzerland, the UK,[8] Venezuela,[9] and the Philippines.[10]”

Please note that the words “have taken place in” do NOT mean “are currently used in.” As I mentioned in my piece, several (6) European countries experimented with electronic voting and then subsequently scrapped the idea as they saw it was not secure.

The fact that you did not grasp this simple fact, and/or did not take the time to scroll down the Wiki page a bit and see the actual data in the table provided, means you were being stupid and/or lazy.

And if you were neither of those things; if you did indeed read the whole Wikipedia page, and then still decided to cherry pick a sentence to consciously draw a false conclusion, then you were being disingenuous.

Maybe this info graphic will help you:

The above graphic is from an article in Quartz that also explains things explains the situation:

In the US and Western Europe, more states have been opting out of electronic voting systems and returning to paper out of worries over the number of glitches and, as we’ve reported before, the inability to verify that electronic votes or the software on machines have not been manipulated.

You are just plain wrong.