The Newsweek article does not reference any "eye witness" asccounts, nor does it name names. The article is an OPINION piece that is mostly preoccupied with condemning Jordan's Queen Rania for doubting the hasbarist narrative around 10/7. As far as atrocities, the opinion writer says that she saw CT scans and remains. She claims to have seen the remains (or scans thereof) of a girl's body with the head almost removed. In short, all she saw was forensic evidence that could not say whether the head was taken off by a Hamas sword or an IDF Hellfire missile.

The writer talks about "incinerated" remains that had been burned at temperatures of "3,000 degrees Celsius', and these were almost certainly victims of the IDF's Apache gunships and tanks - only Hellfire missiles and Merava tank shells can do that.

So no, this is just more hasbara - second and third hand testimony and unscientific proffering of forensic evidence.

This writer, for example, is a doctor specialising in sleep disorders - hardly a candidate for NCIS.

What's more, the writer of this article is a shameless booster of the IDF, a traitorous puppet for the Isrsaeli state, whose blog post for the right wing Times of Israel explains all:

"Israel’s jihad remains my jihad, the IDF my soul soldiers"

The Guardian article is even worse. It admits that there were " significant failings in preserving evidence" and simply makes lame excuses for the fact that no real evidence has ever been presented. It even quotes a highly DISCREDITED source at "Zaka", a corrupt organisation that has made the most outrageous claims about what they saw, but somehow never thought to document. They say they saw the most horrific atrocities, but yet never though to take out their mobile. Sorry, this link is also 100% invalid.