Hi Rachel, thanks for reading and commenting.

I want to know what you think was "Russian propaganda". Do you claim that Thomas Friedman, the New York Times, GW Bush and even Barack Obama were never fans of Putin? Do you dispute the authenticity of my sourcing/links on this?

Do you dispute the Crowdstrike CEO's admission to Congress that the idea of "Russian hacking" of the DNC was never real, and there was no proof of hacking of any kind?

Do you claim that the results of the Senate Intelligence Committee Report was somehow inaccurate or falsified?

Do you think the Rasmussen poll from last year was wrong or flawed in some way?

Do you actually believe that Putin was trying to get Bernie Sanders elected in 2020?

Do you think the Hunter Biden laptop story was "Russian disinformation"?

Do you actually believe that Putin has a "pee tape" of Trump?

Do you seriously believe that Trump has been a "Kremlin asset" since the 1980's?

Do you deny, discount or dispute the NY Times articles that I linked to and quoted extensively?

Do you maintain that the term "Putler" does not really exist in common usage?

Do the Ukrainians not refer to the Russians as subhuman "orcs"?

Is Tchaikovsky not banned anywhere in the West?

Rachel, you do not have to answer any of these questions. I think it would be a waste of everyone's time.

We shall simply accept the fact that your simplistic, pre-programmed, robotic, brainwashed reaction to my article lends proof to my thesis, and leave it at that.